你故意的吧？范戴克防守传中时高举右手导致手球送点（范戴克防守传中时高举右手手球，被判点球）

Interpreting a match incident

I need to respond to a statement in Chinese regarding Van Dijk allegedly causing a handball. The user seems to be reacting to a match incident and possibly accusing me of bias. They might be upset and looking for analysis on whether it was intentional or want an explanation of handball rules. I can explain that modern handball law focuses on the natural body position. It's unlikely Van Dijk acted intentionally; arms are often used for balance, but raising them can create risks.Clarifying handball rules

I need to provide context on the IFAB Laws of the Game for 2024/25 regarding handball. The rules state that intent isn’t crucial if the hand or arm is in an unnatural position or is raised above the shoulder, creating a larger body frame. While deflection off a player’s own body might reduce culpability, a fully extended arm changes the situation. I should focus on giving a general explanation and ask about the specific match or minute while responding concisely in Chinese.Explaining handball nuances

I need to clarify that a VAR review assesses arm position based on movement, distance, and speed. Even with a close-range cross, a penalty is applicable if the arm is above the shoulder, while some exceptions exist for arms used to support during a fall. I should answer that it’s likely not deliberate and a penalty was correctly given according to the rules. I'll keep it concise and in Chinese while highlighting key points and tactical advice.